By taking a look at different fighting styles it
is easy to see that all of the classical one-dimensional
styles is missing something thats pretty important.
In some, like judo, wrestling, aikido striking is
missing whereas other styles, like muay thai, boxing
or taekwondo, lack takedowns and grappling. And
this is fine as long as there is no mistake in defining
these styles as sports rather than combat systems.
Any existing combative art or system was created
to give its practitioner the necessary skills and
confidence to withstand and survive life threatening
situations. The ability for individuals to adapt
to their environment is a condition of survival,
this remains true whether it be learning how to
swim, grow food, build shelter or develop effective
self-defense techniques. Bearing this in mind, it
is essential to understand that you may never know
who your attacker is, or what they know and are
willing to do to you. This is reality, so the best
thing is to be prepared and ready for anything by
having the necessary effective techniques and strategies
(striking, takedowns, clinch and grappling).
Historically each martial art was developed to
deal with certain encounters within a particular
range and most of them work pretty well at what
theyre supposed to do. So comparing karate with
judo, or boxing with wrestling is a pointless task
and reminding of a kid who want to know which is
stronger, the elephant or the whale. Any adult knows
that such a comparison is silly, since a whale lives
in the sea and an elephant lives on land. So, will
the whale leap onto the land to fight the elephant,
or will the elephant dive into the ocean to meet
the whale? Similarly, all one-dimensional martial
arts are nothing but the specific tools and techniques
to deal with only a predefined fragment of reality.
They are reduced to partial systems, segments of
something that used to be, and still needs to be,
whole. Do you really believe that you can take your
bicycle to pieces, then pick up any single part
thats lying around and ride it just as well as
the whole bike itself? Of course not, but isnt
that exactly what happens when you only train in
a partial one-dimensional style, rather than a complete
(MMA) system?
All of the martial arts schools which dont teach
the techniques which complete it as a practical
fighting art, are trying to sell you SINGLE PIECES
and SPARE PARTS while telling that you are actually
buying a WHOLE bicycle. They show you how nicely
their product works inside the school, but take
a second to ask your master if whatever he is
selling you has ever been tested outdoors? The chances
are it hasnt, at least not in the last hundred
years or so. Whats worse is that many of them dont
even care. After all, these days its about belts,
rankings and popularity. So when you start practicing
martial arts you have TWO paths in front of you.
The FIRST and most popular, is to become a practitioner
in comfortable studio, obtain your black belt in
a few years and enjoy having the younger students
bow to you all the time. The SECOND is to train
hard to fight anyone anywhere under any rules. But
remember no belts and bowing because there are no
seniors as everyone is equal. Just be sure to realise
that these are the only important choices you have.
Its more important to train effectively than fall
pray to the well marketed deadly art of the ninja,
kung fu death touch or how to be a taekwondo
black belt in three easy steps. Sounds familiar
doesnt it?